Life Underwater: A Review of Jack

Robinson’s newest novel allows her readers neither to flinch from Jack Boughton’s real fall from grace nor to condemn him to suffer what he deserves.

By Charlie Clark

To paraphrase Whitehead, the safest general characterization of Marilynne Robinson’s Gilead novels is that they consist of a series of footnotes to Housekeeping. That first novel is so densely yet lyrically written; to look up a fond phrase is to risk losing a whole afternoon. All the themes of her later novels are there in nuce. From Gilead to Lila, we find the cold, black water of Fingerbone seeping into sunlit Midwestern parsonages.

So when we come to Jack, we are not surprised to find him saying things like, “The word ‘lake’ is related to the word ‘lack.’ An absence.” The lake in Housekeeping is the town’s shadow, the home of all its missing citizens, the presence of everything lost; it is the world in negative. In the lake, all our familiar oppositions are destabilized— “a good foundation was worse than useless. A house should have a compass and a keel.” On the shore, society’s regulars live out their quiet desperation; below the surface, the outcasts and dropouts make their life in death. Housekeeping is the story of a passage into that underworld, to Ruthie’s becoming one of the lake’s restless ghosts. She says of her aunt, as Sylvie inducts her into the life of a transient, “I dreamed that Sylvie was teaching me to walk under water.”

Jack seems to have been born underwater. Though not exactly a transient, he is a drifter. He drifts in place, the place being St. Louis, bumming from job to job, flop to flop. Speaking of St. Louis, it’s remarkable how little the Mississippi figures in the novel (“the brown god is almost forgotten”). But then, there is nothing riverine about Jack Boughton, nothing coursing; he is indeed a lake creature (a “lack” creature). Jack is an alcoholic who lives one step ahead of his barroom creditors. He is a convicted thief, a penitentiary graduate.

It seems to everyone, Jack included, that he was somehow born on the wrong side of life and light.

Jack’s subaquatic life suggests some fall from grace. Robinson takes her text from Paradise Lost. “The Prince of Darkness, the Prince of Absence,” Jack calls himself, and here, as in Gilead and Home, he questions the possibility of his own reprobation. It seems to everyone, Jack included, that he was somehow born on the wrong side of light and life. In this novel, we finally get a look inside his head, at what puts the devil in him.

We discover that Jack has an irresistible attraction to fragility. He can’t help testing things, so he breaks them. Anything undefended calls out to be stolen. The impulse extends even to himself; he has to push himself over the edge, through anxiety into embarrassment and drunkenness. Jack shares the dreadful self-awareness of Milton’s Satan. He cannot hide the inevitable judgment from himself, any more than he can stop himself from flouting it. And just like Milton’s Satan, his predicament, however self-made, can move us to something like sympathy.

The metaphoric frame shifts, and Jack is now Adam, alone in a garden. He meets a woman. And the woman is very good. From the first pages of the novel, those who have read Gilead may think they know the story. But Robinson will not make it so easy on them. Here again, all our categories are turned over and over as roles reverse themselves. In Gilead and Home, Della is Jack’s redeemer. When we discover her existence, we suddenly find his is justified. Jack forces us to remember that she is his victim. Back in Iowa, did we ever ask what she gave up to save him? Jack is not so much Della’s Adam as her Eve: drawing his beloved down into life underwater. He is her Fall.

To be scandalized by mercy is itself a scandal.

But for Robinson, like Milton, there is such a thing as a fortunate fall. Christ too was a victim. (“God himself was pulled after us into the vortex we made when we fell, or so the story goes.”) Robinson allows us to see Della’s doomed love as loss, but not as mere loss. However much it will be despised by those around her, however much it deserves their condemnation for all the other real and long-expected goods it forecloses, Della’s love is a participation in God’s self-gift. And apparently the one aperture through which grace can reach Jack is his love for her.

There is scandal in Jack’s receiving this mercy. Some theologically-minded critics have accused Robinson’s past novels of antinomianism for appearing to let Jack off the hook. But to be scandalized by mercy is itself a scandal: Shall we deny that Jack should possess a goodness not his own? Where would that leave us? Our only alternative is to recognize our submersion in his. It is an upbuilding thought that in relation to God we are all underwater.

Charlie Clark is a writer and retractor. He lives in New Hampshire.

Jack was published by Farrar, Straus and Giroux, an imprint of MacMillan. Fare Forward thanks the publisher for providing our reviewer with an advance copy. You can purchase a copy Jack on the publisher’s website.